Open AI Dangerous Technology

Skip to content

The OpenAI CEO Disagrees With the Forecast That AI Will Kill Us All

An artificial intelligence Twitter beef, explained. 

The OpenAI logo arranged on a laptop in Beijing, China, on Friday, Feb. 24, 2023. The rally in Chinese artificial intelligence stocks is showing further signs of cooling amid media reports of authorities banning access to OpenAI's ChatGPT service.
The OpenAI logo arranged on a laptop in Beijing, China, on Friday, Feb. 24, 2023. The rally in Chinese artificial intelligence stocks is showing further signs of cooling amid media reports of authorities banning access to OpenAI's ChatGPT service.Bloomberg
You're Reading Tech Daily.
Get exclusive reporting and industry-leading access from Bloomberg reporters around the world.
By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service and to receive offers and promotions from Bloomberg.

As the tech industry marches toward ever more dazzling artificial intelligence technology, there’s one unavoidable question for humanity: Is this good news, or bad news?

In Silicon Valley, there’s a small but powerful group of people who believe it could be very, very bad news — and that AI, if not handled correctly, could wipe out humanity within a couple decades. There’s also a crowd who thinks our AI future will be amazing — bringing about untold future capabilities, abundance and utopia.

This week in a feature for Bloomberg Businessweek, I dive into the faction of the tech industry that believes it’s scrambling to save the world from a killer. The saga involves the marriage of the charitable philosophy called effective altruism and AI doomerism, and features Sam Bankman-Fried, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and, believe it or not, Harry Potter. It also has an unsavory underbelly — allegations of sexual abuse and whiffs of an apocalyptic doomsday religion.

In the last few years, Silicon Valley’s obsession with the astronomical stakes of future AI has curdled into a bitter feud. And right now, that schism is playing out online between two people: AI theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky and OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman. Since the early 2000s, Yudkowsky has been sounding the alarm that artificial general intelligence is likely to be “unaligned” with human values and could decide to wipe us out. He worked aggressively to get others to adopt the prevention of AI apocalypse as a priority — enough that he helped convince Musk to take the risk seriously. Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit with Altman in 2015, with the goal of creating safer AI.

In the last few years, OpenAI has adopted a for-profit model and churned out bigger, faster, and more advanced AI technology. The company has raised billions in investment, and Altman has cheered on the progress toward artificial general intelligence, or AGI. “There will be scary moments as we move towards AGI-level systems, and significant disruptions, but the upsides can be so amazing that it’s well worth overcoming the great challenges to get there,” he tweeted in December.

Yudkowsky, meanwhile, has lost nearly all hope that humanity will handle AI responsibly, he said on a podcast last month. After the creation of OpenAI, with its commitment to advancing AI development, he said he cried by himself late at night and thought, “Oh, so this is what humanity will elect to do. We will not rise above. We will not have more grace, not even here at the very end.”

Given that background, it certainly seemed like rubbing salt in a wound when Altman tweeted recently that Yudkowsky had “done more to accelerate AGI than anyone else” and might someday “deserve the Nobel Peace Prize” for his work. Read a certain way, he was trolling Yudkowsky, saying the AI theorist had, in trying to prevent his most catastrophic fear, significantly hastened its arrival. (Yudkowsky said he could not know if Altman was trolling him; Altman declined to comment.)

There you have it. A somewhat inscrutable, inside-baseball catfight between two AI thinkers — but it highlights the all-or-nothing, salvation-or-damnation context underlying much of the AI news you’ll see these days.

Then again, maybe the beef isn’t as beefy as we think. Last month, Altman tweeted a selfie in which he posed flanked by Yudkowsky on one side, and Elon Musk’s former partner, Canadian singer Grimes, on the other. So whether AI will kill us all in 20 years or not, at least for now, everyone can still hang out together at parties. 

The big story

Intel has embarked on a massive build-out of new production in Germany to help rebalance the concentration of east Asian manufacturing, but bad economic conditions have forced the chip giant to postpone construction of its Magdeburg plant as it seeks additional German government subsidies.

Get fully charged

The implosion of FTX has exposed how many digital-asset platforms lack insurance, and the long road that lies ahead to rebuilding trust in the crypto industry.

Salesforce launched a $250 million fund for generative AI startups — its largest to date — as the software giant tries to get into the AI game.

South Korea’s rocket scientists have turned to a simple internet search service to find an engine they could mimic as the country tries to build out a space program.

WeWork, the long-struggling workspace rental company, is in talks to raise hundreds of millions in cash

More from Bloomberg

Listen: Foundering: The John McAfee Story is a new six-part podcast series retracing the life, the myths and the self-destruction of a Silicon Valley icon. Subscribe for free on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Watch: The Future With Hannah Fry explores the potential of life extension, emotionally sensitive computers and more in this Bloomberg Originals show.

Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox:

  • Cyber Bulletin for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage
  • Game On for reporting on the video game business
  • Power On for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more
  • Screentime for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley
  • Soundbite for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends
    Up Next
    Tech Sector H-1B Workers’ Spouses Can Work in US, Judge Says

    Tech Sector H-1B Workers’ Spouses Can Work in US, Judge Says

    • Court dismisses lawsuit by Save Jobs USA challenging H-4 visas
    • Amazon, Apple and other tech giants had strongly opposed suit
    Google campus in Mountain View, California.

    Google campus in Mountain View, California.

    Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
    Updated on

    Big technology companies won a major court victory in Washington, where a judge dismissed a suit challenging the rights of highly skilled H-1B visa holders’ spouses to work in the US.

    US District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Tuesday issued a decision upholding the Obama-era rule under which the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has issued H-4 visas to the spouses of hundreds of thousands of H-1B workers in the US, 70% of whom hold science and engineering jobs in the tech sector. Amazon.com Inc.Apple Inc.GoogleMicrosoft Corp. were among the companies who urged the judge to let the rule stand.


    टिप्पणियाँ